(Image source from: Timesnownews.com)

The case against the Pune adolescent - who killed two individuals early Sunday while inebriated and driving his father's ₹ 2.5 crore Porsche supercar - took an extra turn Thursday evening. The police will presently too examine potential slips in convention within the hours taking after the occurrence, counting conceivable special treatment for the 17-year-old child of a conspicuous city builder. Particularly, a senior cop - Right hand Commissioner of Police Ashwini Rakh - will address officers and staff at the police station in Yerwada where the complaint was to begin with. The charges incorporate underplaying the horrendous nature of the occurrence within the to begin with write-ups and deferring a medical examination, which ought to have been done quickly to set up the boy's blood liquor level. But perhaps most stunning could be a claim that the cops were more fascinated by 'investigating' Aneesh Awadhiya and Ashwini Koshta - the 24-year-old computer program experts who were slaughtered. In the interim, an restriction lawmaker has said the boy was dealt with cautiously and indeed given nourishment - pizzas and burgers - whereas in police guardianship as an accused in a stomach-churning street mishap. The claim was made by Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi chief and two-time ex-Lok Sabha MP Prakash Ambedkar, who posted on X, "Officers at Yerwada Police Station went through more time addressing the relationship between Anish and Ashwini - IT experts lethally thumped down by tanked minor -whereas the denounced was purportedly served burger and pizza", and postured six questions to the cops.

Among the questions he raised were the eight-hour delay in regulating a blood liquor test and why the boy was not sent straightforwardly to a remand home. There was shock after the Adolescent Board gave the boy safeguard inside 15 hours on conditions as silly as two bonds of ₹ 7,500 each and composing a 300-word paper on street accidents. Late Wednesday that arrangement was reexamined and the boy was sent to a remand home till June 5. At the show the boy faces an intoxicated driving charge that, for a first-time offense, limits discipline to six months jail and a fine of ₹ 10,000. A charge of punishable crime not producing to kill will be required ought to the Adolescent Board permit him to be attempted as a grown-up. Congress MP Rahul Gandhi has moreover addressed the cops over particular treatment for the boy, inquiring why denunciations in comparable cases - on the off chance that they are auto or cab drivers - do not get safeguard as rapidly.

"When an adolescent from a wealthy family drinks liquor and slaughters two individuals in a Porsche... he is told to write an 'essay'. Why are transport, truck, and auto drivers, or cabbies, not inquired to write such papers? The address is of rise to equity for the destitute and affluent" he inquired. Police have moreover found the portable phone of the boy's father, who was captured the day after the occurrence from Sambhajinagar (prior Aurangabad) after an expand protect arrangement was foiled. The phone - caught on to be the father's unique, which he cleared out at home whereas attempting to elude the cops - is presently within the custody of the Wrongdoing Department, which says he isn't participating with the probe. The father faces a charge of willful disregard of his child beneath Area 75 of the Adolescent Equity Act. The bar where the boy was served liquor has been fixed, and its proprietor and staff are in police guardianship. They are being explored for offering alcohol to an under-aged person. At 17 a long time and 8 months, the boy was four months short of the lawful age for driving and eight a long time shy of Maharashtra's lawful drinking age, which is 25.